Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 04:43

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Do you have any opinion on Japanese writer/actor Yukio Mishima?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Unclear if rock bottom, but Braves hit it anyway in 11-10 stunner loss - Battery Power
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Citi Calls Time on Gold’s Rally Due to Slumping Demand, Fed Cuts - Bloomberg.com
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Which genre of novels is most profitable to publish and why?
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What are the psychological reasons behind an extreme obsession with another human being?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
FanDuel announces 50-cent fee on all bets in Illinois - Awful Announcing